Navigating Non-Compliance Penalties in India’s Food M&A

India’s food industry, a $900 billion powerhouse including agriculture, drives ~10% of GDP and employs a similar share of the workforce. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in this sector face increasing scrutiny, with non-compliance penalties posing significant risks to deal success. This article equips senior leaders with insights to mitigate non-compliance penalties in food M&A, blending management, finance, legal, and technology expertise to ensure sustainable growth.

Industry Overview & Context: Navigating Growth and Non-Compliance Penalties in India’s Food M&A Landscape

The food industry spans agri-processing, packaged food, beverages, quick-service restaurants (QSRs), food delivery, cold chain, and nutraceuticals. Urbanisation, health-focused consumption, supply chain formalisation, and technology adoption fuel consolidation. Food M&A enables companies to capture market share, optimise operations, and scale innovations. Regulatory approvals from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and Competition Commission of India (CCI) are critical, yet non-compliance penalties can trigger FSSAI fines, approval delays, or reputational damage. Robust due diligence is essential to navigate regulatory risks and avoid deal consequences like transaction reversals.

Recent Developments (as of June 2025)

The Ministry of Food Processing Industries (MoFPI) updated its Production Linked Incentive (PLI) 2.0 guidelines in 2025, boosting deal attractiveness by incentivising innovation and compliance. However, these updates intensify scrutiny on post-merger operations, where non-compliance penalties can forfeit incentives. FSSAI’s real-time compliance tools, including digital audits and traceability platforms, now monitor merged entities closely. Recent food M&A deals stalled due to undisclosed liabilities, such as licensing violations or safety lapses. Legal precedents underscore non-compliance penaltie, with courts imposing hefty FSSAI fines for inherited regulatory gaps, amplifying deal consequences.

• Key Non-Compliance Risks in Food M&A

Acquiring a food business means inheriting its regulatory footprint, which carries significant risks:

1. FSSAI fines for inherited violations: Acquirers face non-compliance penalties if the target has undisclosed issues with licensing, labeling, or product formulation. For example, misdeclared ingredients or expired licenses can lead to substantial FSSAI fines.
2. Regulatory risks from inadequate due diligence: Overlooking food safety issues, such as contamination or poor hygiene, exposes acquirers to investigations, recalls, and non-compliance penalties.
3. Deal consequences: Regulatory scrutiny from FSSAI or CCI can delay approvals, reverse transactions, or damage reputations, especially when non-compliance penalties emerge post-deal.
4. Segment-specific risks: QSRs face strict hygiene standards, packaged food companies navigate complex labeling rules, and export-oriented players contend with international regulations. Violations in these areas trigger severe FSSAI fines and market setbacks.

• Strategic Implications Using a Hybrid Consulting Lens

Mitigating non-compliance penalties requires a multi-faceted approach:

1. Legal & Compliance Strategy: Conduct thorough pre-deal audits to map inherited liabilities. Develop a post-merger FSSAI integration plan to align with regulations, minimising non-compliance penalties.
2. Financial Risk Mitigation: Structure deals with holdbacks or indemnities to protect against unforeseen FSSAI fines. Quantify potential regulatory risks during due diligence to inform valuations.
3. Operational Readiness: Upgrade food safety systems and traceability tech post-acquisition. Train workforces on compliance to prevent non-compliance penalties rooted in operational lapses.
4. Technology Enablement: Deploy AI for real-time compliance monitoring, flagging violations before they escalate. Use digital traceability and data analytics for predictive risk management, reducing exposure to FSSAI fines.

Illustrative Examples

A food processor faced ₹5 crore in FSSAI fines post-merger due to undisclosed labeling violations overlooked during due diligence. This led to financial losses and reputational harm, highlighting severe deal consequences. Conversely, a QSR chain avoided non-compliance penalties by deploying AI-driven audit tools during integration. These tools monitored hygiene and sourcing in real-time, ensuring compliance and safeguarding the deal’s success.

Conclusion

Non-compliance penalties in food M&A carry significant financial, legal, and reputational deal consequences. Senior leaders must prioritise proactive due diligence, robust post-merger compliance, and technology adoption to mitigate regulatory risks. By integrating legal, financial, operational, and technological strategies, companies can avoid FSSAI fines and build resilient, trusted businesses in India’s competitive food industry.

About LawCrust

LawCrust Global Consulting Ltd. delivers cutting-edge Hybrid Consulting Solutions in Management, Finance, Technology, and Legal Consulting to ambitious businesses worldwide. Recognised for our cross-functional expertise and hybrid consulting approach, we empower startups, SMEs, and enterprises to scale efficiently, innovate boldly, and navigate complexity with confidence. Our services span key areas such as Investment Banking, Fundraising, Mergers & Acquisitions, Private Placement, and Debt Restructuring & Transformation, positioning us as a strategic partner for growth and resilience. With an integrated consulting model, fixed-cost engagements, and a virtual delivery framework, we make business transformation accessible, agile, and impactful.

For expert legal help, please contact us:

• Email: inquiry@lawcrustbusiness.com